![]() |
UNI_ASK_U | |||
Description | ||||
|
UNI_ASK_U
In non-cognitive measurement, certain traits such as clinical or psychiatric symptoms, addictions, extreme beliefs or maladaptive personality
traits can be plausibly modeled as unipolar dimensions (Lucke, 2014, 2015; Reise & Waller, 2009). The low end of the dimension merely reflects
the absence of trait manifestations while the high end reflects different levels of trait severity or extremeness. Furthermore, it is reasonable
to scale this type of dimensions as adopting only positive values and to assume that they are more informative and meaningful at the upper end.
When traits of this type are measured in community populations, an expected result is that the items and test scores have extreme (rightly skewed)
distributions, because most individuals are expected to have low trait levels and be piled-up at the lower end.
References Ferrando, P. J., Morales-Vives, F., & Hernandez-Dorado, A. (2024). Measuring unipolar traits with continuous-response items: Some methodological and substantive developments. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 84(3), 425-449. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131644231181889 Ferrando, P. J., Morales-Vives, F., Casas, J. M., & Navarro-González, D. (2025). A Weibull-Link Response Model for measuring Unipolar-Skewed Constructs with Continuous Responses. [Journal details pending] Lucke, J. F. (2014). Positive trait item response models. In R. E. Millsap, L. A. van der Ark, D. M. Bolt, and C. M. Woods (Eds.), New developments in quantitative psychology (pp. 199–213). Springer. Lucke, J. F. (2015). Unipolar item response models. In S. P. Reise and D. A. Revicki (Eds.), Handbook of item response theory modeling: Applications to typical performance assessment (pp. 272–284). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315736013Reise, S. P., & Waller, N. G. (2009). Item response theory and clinical measurement. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 5, 27-48. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.032408.153553
| |||